Sugaronline Editorial - Standing up to development By Meghan Sapp

Published: 10/20/2017, 12:33:00 AM

What's good for the goose is good for gander, but what about the breeding station?



What's good for the goose is good for gander, but what about the breeding station?

 


Nobody likes a NIMBY; those neighbours who don't want to see any growth, any change, any development in their idyllic towns so vehemently oppose anything. Not In My Back Yard.

But then there are times when proposed developments can have such devastating effects on a community, or on an industry such as sugarcane, that one must stand up and say enough. That's what MSF Sugar did when the Queensland government sought to develop a new 840ha industrial area south of Cairns to support the growing tourism industry but with the potential to negatively impact MSF's operations.

MSF told the government during the public consultation period that the proposed State Development Area would limit future operations and potentially lead to the closure of the Mulgrave Mill in Gordonvale in an area where nearly a quarter of the population relies on the sugar industry for its livelihood. The company has more than A$150 million in planned investments including expansion in the exact area of the planned SDA such as a power plant a biorefinery. Not surprisingly, the company put a freeze on its investment plans until the situation was clarified, something that concerns cane farmers greatly.

But MSF isn't the only sugar player at risk. The Sugar Research Australia breeding station at Moringa is in the same area, with the northern part of the station’s property within the proposed SDA. The SRA believes the project’s developers forgot about the station completely when designing the plan. It’s the only breeding station in the country, located in the ideal place for the research that can take 12 years to develop a new variety, meaning that moving it is almost entirely out of the question. Even if it was just a matter of finding the funds to move, it’s not realistic.

But there's some good news to report this week. On Friday, MSF signed a Memorandum of Understanding with the Queensland government guaranteeing "no net loss" of sugarcane land following months of negotiations. So with the company’s access to sugarcane land guaranteed for the future, it says it can move forward with its planned investments and the mill—and all those jobs supporting it—are no longer at risk. But though things look better for the company, no mention of the SRA breeding centre was made in the announcement regarding the MOU so its future may well still be in jeopardy.

As one of the funders of the SRA, MSF and the rest of the industry should work together to ensure the breeding station gets the same protection from the planned industrial development as MSF has negotiated with the government. It’s in the company’s best interest, as well as the industry as a whole.

:: Recent Reports

pdfSugaronline Editorial - A peek behind the mask By Meghan Sapp2017/11/17
pdfSugaronline Editorial - All that glitters isn’t gold By Meghan Sapp2017/11/10
pdfSugaronline Editorial - Who’s afraid of the big bad wolf? By Meghan Sapp2017/11/03
pdfSugaronline Editorial - The good ole’ switcheroo By Meghan Sapp2017/10/27
pdfSugaronline Editorial - Standing up to development By Meghan Sapp2017/10/20
pdfSugaronline Editorial - Off to the races By Meghan Sapp2017/10/13
pdfSugaronline Editorial - Keeping an eye on hurri-cane season By Meghan Sapp2017/10/06
pdfSugaronline Editorial - End of an Era By Meghan Sapp2017/09/29
pdfSugaronline Guest Editorial - The last nail in the coffin for Kenya’s sugar industry? By Jane Thirikali2017/09/22
pdfSugaronline Editorial - SOS for SRA By Meghan Sapp2017/09/15
pdfSugaronline Editorial - Water, water everywhere and not a drop to drink By Meghan Sapp2017/09/08
pdfSugaronline Editorial - Race to tax sugar ramps up again By Meghan Sapp2017/09/01
pdfSugaronline Editorial - The opposite of free By Meghan Sapp2017/08/25
pdfSugaronline Editorial - The question of price vs. morals By Meghan Sapp2017/08/18
pdfSugaronline Editorial - The future bioeconomy is now By Meghan Sapp2017/08/11
pdfSugaronline Editorial - The US$4 million question By Meghan Sapp2017/08/04
pdfSugaronline Editorial - The big fat bully By Meghan Sapp2017/07/28
pdfSugaronline Editorial - Kenya; A Desertion, a Funeral and a new Hire by Jane Thirikali2017/07/21
pdfSugaronline Editorial - The only thing worse than Alzheimer’s… By Meghan Sapp2017/07/14
pdfSugaronline Editorial - Doing your homework By Meghan Sapp2017/07/07
pdfSugaronline Editorial - The upside down of the in and outs of Kenyan sugar trade By Jane Thirikali2017/06/19
pdfSugaronline Editorial - Doing things right By Meghan Sapp2017/06/16
pdfSugaronline Editorial - It’s not too late to back down By Meghan Sapp2017/06/09
pdfSugaronline Editorial - The final countdown By Meghan Sapp2017/06/02
pdfSugaronline Editorial - The buck stops here By Meghan Sapp2017/05/26
1 of 32