Sugaronline Editorial - The view from the underside of a bus By Meghan Sapp

Published: 12/01/2017, 12:37:00 AM

Eh, what's a few hundred thousand tonnes of sugar and ethanol quota between friends?



Eh, what's a few hundred thousand tonnes of sugar and ethanol quota between friends?

 


"No, no, the European Commission has already said that sugar is off the table with Mercosur. Now it’s just a matter of ethanol and beef, and beef looks like they’re going to have to give up a lot more," went the conversation at this week’s 26th annual International Sugar Organisation meeting in London.

"That’s what they say now, but sugar always gets thrown under the bus, you’ll see," said a man in the know.

It wasn’t even eight hours between that conversation and when Sugaronline reported from Brazil that the European Commission had offered Mercosur countries 100,000 metric tonnes of sugar quota in order to get the deal done. The offer included the same EUR98 per tonne import duty applied to Brazil’s existing CXL quota, in effect making the quota offer useless—according to local industry.

But, it’s just the offer. Instead of new, useless quota, the Mercosur industry wants its existing 400,000 tonne quota to be converted into duty-free. There’s still time for the proposed duty level to be decreased, or eliminated, or converted into a mix of lower quota with no or low duty, or any number of possible combinations that will ensure the EU-Mercosur trade deal is closed during the last round of negotiations next week.

And close, it will.

Currently, Europe’s offer also includes 600,000 metric tonnes of ethanol—perhaps coincidental that it’s the same level as Brazil’s ethanol import quota?—but industry wants 1 million tonnes. That’s also a wide gap that needs to be closed. With Europe’s sugar industry already looking at the underside of the bus, will there be enough room under the bus for their ethanol colleagues as well? There just may be, them buses can be quite big.

:: Recent Reports

pdfSugaronline Editorial - Risk, or wishful thinking? By Meghan Sapp2017/12/08
pdfSugaronline Editorial - The view from the underside of a bus By Meghan Sapp2017/12/01
pdfSugaronline Editorial - Tik tok…tik tok… By Meghan Sapp2017/11/24
pdfSugaronline Editorial - A peek behind the mask By Meghan Sapp2017/11/17
pdfSugaronline Editorial - All that glitters isn’t gold By Meghan Sapp2017/11/10
pdfSugaronline Editorial - Who’s afraid of the big bad wolf? By Meghan Sapp2017/11/03
pdfSugaronline Editorial - The good ole’ switcheroo By Meghan Sapp2017/10/27
pdfSugaronline Editorial - Standing up to development By Meghan Sapp2017/10/20
pdfSugaronline Editorial - Off to the races By Meghan Sapp2017/10/13
pdfSugaronline Editorial - Keeping an eye on hurri-cane season By Meghan Sapp2017/10/06
pdfSugaronline Editorial - End of an Era By Meghan Sapp2017/09/29
pdfSugaronline Guest Editorial - The last nail in the coffin for Kenya’s sugar industry? By Jane Thirikali2017/09/22
pdfSugaronline Editorial - SOS for SRA By Meghan Sapp2017/09/15
pdfSugaronline Editorial - Water, water everywhere and not a drop to drink By Meghan Sapp2017/09/08
pdfSugaronline Editorial - Race to tax sugar ramps up again By Meghan Sapp2017/09/01
pdfSugaronline Editorial - The opposite of free By Meghan Sapp2017/08/25
pdfSugaronline Editorial - The question of price vs. morals By Meghan Sapp2017/08/18
pdfSugaronline Editorial - The future bioeconomy is now By Meghan Sapp2017/08/11
pdfSugaronline Editorial - The US$4 million question By Meghan Sapp2017/08/04
pdfSugaronline Editorial - The big fat bully By Meghan Sapp2017/07/28
pdfSugaronline Editorial - Kenya; A Desertion, a Funeral and a new Hire by Jane Thirikali2017/07/21
pdfSugaronline Editorial - The only thing worse than Alzheimer’s… By Meghan Sapp2017/07/14
pdfSugaronline Editorial - Doing your homework By Meghan Sapp2017/07/07
pdfSugaronline Editorial - The upside down of the in and outs of Kenyan sugar trade By Jane Thirikali2017/06/19
pdfSugaronline Editorial - Doing things right By Meghan Sapp2017/06/16
1 of 33